Papers by Bhavana Dalvi Mishra

7 papers
Enhancing Systematic Decompositional Natural Language Inference Using Informal Logic (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent language models allow structured reasoning with text, but lack of a clear protocol for discerning entailment causes noisy datasets and limited performance gains.
Approach: They propose a consistent approach to annotating decompositional entailment and evaluate its impact on LLM-based textual inference.
Outcome: The proposed approach has higher internal consistency than prior decompositional entailment datasets and significantly improves proof quality and accuracy.
Do language models have coherent mental models of everyday things? (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Psychologists and cognitive scientists hypothesize that humans develop mental models of the world, namely internal, conceptual representations of the environment which we base our decisions and actions on.
Approach: They propose to add a constraint satisfaction layer to the LM's raw predictions to apply commonsense constraints to reduce incoherence.
Outcome: The proposed extension removes inconsistencies and improves accuracy by 16-20%.
Towards Teachable Reasoning Systems: Using a Dynamic Memory of User Feedback for Continual System Improvement (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Using simulated feedback, our system (called TeachMe) continually improves with time, and without model retraining.
Approach: They propose to augment a QA model with a dynamic memory of user feedback, containing user-supplied corrections toerroneous model beliefs that users identify during interaction.
Outcome: The proposed system improves with time and without model retraining, and with real users, by 15% on a hidden test set after teaching.
HypER: Literature-grounded Hypothesis Generation and Distillation with Provenance (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing approaches focus on retrieval augmentation and focus on the quality of the output . Existing methods focus on generating a highly specific declarative statement ignoring the underlying reasoning process behind ideation.
Approach: They propose a large language model that generates evidence-based hypotheses using literature-guided reasoning and a multi-task setting.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms the base model and generates evidence-grounded hypotheses with high feasibility and impact as judged by human experts.
Latent Factor Models Meets Instructions: Goal-conditioned Latent Factor Discovery without Task Supervision (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Instruction-following LLMs have recently allowed systems to discover hidden concepts from a collection of unstructured documents based on a natural language description of the purpose of the discovery (i.e., goal).
Approach: They propose a goal-oriented latent factor discovery system that integrates LLM’s instruction-following ability with statistical models to handle large, noisy datasets where LLM reasoning alone falls short.
Outcome: The proposed system improves task performance by 5-52% over baselines and 1.8 times as often as the best alternative, on average, in human evaluation.
CodeScientist: End-to-End Semi-Automated Scientific Discovery with Code-based Experimentation (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Automated scientific discovery (ASD) systems are limited in their evaluation of software artifacts and large volumes of research artifs are typically evaluated using conference-style paper review with limited evaluation of code.
Approach: They propose a novel ASD system that frames ideation and experiment construction as a form of genetic search jointly over combinations of research articles and codeblocks defining common actions in a domain.
Outcome: The proposed system returns 19 discoveries on machine-generated ideas in the domain of agents and virtual environments.
Entailer: Answering Questions with Faithful and Truthful Chains of Reasoning (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a system that can show how its answers are implied by its own internal beliefs via a systematic chain of reasoning would allow better understanding of why a model produced the answer it did.
Approach: They propose to combine a backward-chaining model with a verifier that checks that the model itself believes those premises through self-querying to generate multistep chains that are both faithful (the answer follows from the reasoning)
Outcome: The proposed model generates chains that are faithful and truthful while maintaining answer accuracy.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations